Skip to main content

Full text of "Additions to the genus Cratospila Foerster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from South Korea"

See other formats


JHR 92: 173-184 (2022) or JOURNAL OF > 4?eertevewed open-access Jourel 

doi: 10.3897/jhr.92.86954 RESEARCH ARTICLE () Hymenopter a 
. 

https://jhr.pensoft.net The Iarational Sociery of Hymenoperiss, RESEARCH 


Additions to the genus Cratospila Foerster 
(Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) 
from South Korea 


Ju-Hyeong Sohn", Cornelis van Achterberg?*’, Yeonghyeok Yu', Hyojoong Kim! 


| Animal Systematics Lab., Department of Biological Science, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, 54150, 
Republic of Korea 2. State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou, 310058, China 
3 Key Lab of Agricultural Entomology, Institute of Insect Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China 


Corresponding author: Hyojoong Kim (hkim@kunsan.ac.kr) 


Academic editor: Jose Fernandez-Triana | Received 25 May 2022 | Accepted 30 June 2022 | Published 31 August 2022 
Attps://zoobank.org/B301EDB5-B06D-4219-8D0A-6308B1B8ACBD 


Citation: Sohn J-H, van Achterberg C, Yu Y, Kim H (2022) Additions to the genus Cratospila Foerster (Hymenoptera, 
Braconidae, Alysiinae) from South Korea. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.3897/ 
jhr.92.86954 


Abstract 

Two new species of the genus Cvatospila Foerster, 1863 (Braconidae: Alysiinae), Cratospila albosignata 
sp. nov. and C. longivena sp. nov., are described and illustrated. In addition, the DNA barcode region 
of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COL) of both species has been sequenced with three 
previously described species (C. albifera, C. luteocephala and C. syntoma). Alysia ponerola Papp, 2009 
which was recorded from North Korea is transfered in Cratospila (C. ponerola (Papp, 2009) comb. nov.). 


All species validly recorded from Korea are included in a revised key. 


Keywords 


Alysiini, COI, Hymenoptera, new combination, new record, new species, taxonomy 


Introduction 


The subfamily Alysiinae is a large taxon of the family Braconidae, which includes two 
tribes, Alysiini and Dacnusini with 76 genera and 31 genera, respectively (Yu et al. 
2016). Alysiinae contains over 2,440 valid species and the subfamily occurs worldwide 


* These authors contributed equally to this paper. 


Copyright Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al, This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC 
BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 


174 Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al. / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184 (2022) 


(Yu et al. 2016), of which 180 species in 21 genera are listed in the National Species 
List of South Korea (NIBR 2021). Although, Alysiinae are very similar to members of 
the subfamily Opiinae both genetically and morphologically, the former can be distin- 
guished from the latter easily by having the exodont (= non-overlapping) mandibles. 
Alysiinae is known as a group of koinobiont endoparasitoids of cyclorraphous dipter- 
ous larvae. They use the outward-curved teeth of the mandibles to break open the host 
puparium (Docavo et al. 2002). Some species are commercially utilized for biological 
control (Ozawa et al. 2001; Chabert et al. 2012). 

The genus Cratospila Foerster, 1863, is a small and rather isolated taxon in the 
subfamily Alysiinae, including 18 species worldwide (Yu et al. 2016; Sohn et al. 2021). 
This genus is easy to be diagnosed by having the first flagellomere at least 1.5 times 
longer than the second flagellomere and often with white antennal segments apically. 
So far, four species have been known in the Oriental region but two species of them 
are doubtful. Bhat (1980) reported C. curvabilis from India and C. bhutanensis from 
Bhutan; considering the original description it is questionable if the first species be- 
longs to Cratospila. Tobias (1990) described C. alboapicalis from Vietnam. Additional- 
ly, Wharton (2002) described six species (C. confusa, C. difficis, C. dracula, C. elongata, 
C. masneri, C. neocirce and C. storeyi) from Australia. Cratospila circe (Haliday, 1838) 
was reported from North Korea by Papp (1994) and also from Malaysia by Yaakop and 
Aman (2012), but both records are likely to concern one of the very similar local spe- 
cies of the genus (Sohn et al. 2021). So far, C. circe has been found only in the Western 
Palaearctic region. Checking figures of the holotype of Alysia ponerola Papp, 2009 
(Papp 2009; NIBR 2012) made us aware that likely this species was classified into the 
wrong genus and should be transferred to Cratospila (C. ponerola (Papp, 2009) comb. 
nov.). Fortunately, it is different from the very similar and recently described C. albifera 
Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 from S. Korea as indicated in the added key. 

In this study, we present new morphological characters and the barcoding se- 
quences of the CO/ region of both new species together with three previously de- 
scribed species (C. albifera, C. luteocephala and C. syntoma). Descriptions, diagnoses, 
species identification key, and photographs of the diagnostic characters of the new 
species are provided. 


Materials and methods 


Samples used in this study were collected with Malaise traps in South Korea at the Ne- 
bang-ri, Sudong-myeon, Nanyangju-si, Gyeonggi-do and Unilam Banilam, Jucheon- 
myeon, Jinan-gun, Jeollabuk-do. Sorting and preparation were done at the Animal 
Systematics Lab. (ASL), Department of Biology, Kunsan National University (KSNU) 
at Gunsan. For morphological identification, Wharton et al. (1997) and Zhu et al. 
(2017) were used. Morphological characters were observed with a Leica M205C ste- 
reo microscope. The Taxapad database (Yu et al. 2016) was used for references. We 


Review of the genus Cratospila (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from S. Korea 175 


followed the terminology of Wharton (2002) and van Achterberg (1993). The type 
specimens are deposited KNA (Korea National Arboretum). 

A Leica DMC2900 digital camera and a Leica M205 C microscope (Leica Geosys- 
tems AG) were used for photography and several pictures being taken for each height 
using multi-focusing technology. LAS V4.11 (Leica Geosystems AG) and Helicon- 
Focus 7 (Helicon Soft) software were used for stacking work. After stacking work, 
illustrations were created using Adobe Photoshop CS6. 

Extraction of DNA was done in ASL, KSNU. Whole genomic DNA was extracted 
from the specimens by using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN Inc., Dussel- 
dorf, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. In order to conserve morpho- 
logically complete voucher specimens, DNA extraction method was used slightly modi- 
fied from ‘non-destructive method’ by Favret (2005) and ‘freezing method’ by Yaakop 
et al. (2009). In the original protocol, the sample was crushed or wounded, and then 
soaked with 180 ul of buffer ATL + 20 pl of proteinase, following by three hours over 
incubation at 55 °C. In the slightly modified DNA extraction methods, samples were 
soaked with 180 ul of buffer ATL + 20 ul of proteinase K without destroying the sam- 
ple, followed by 10 minutes incubation at 55 °C and then kept in a freezer at -22 °C 
overnight. After that the general protocol was used for the remaining steps. The primer 
set of LCO-1490 (5°--GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’) and HCO-2198 
(5’°-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3’) was used to amplify approximately 
658 bp as the partial front region of the COM. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) prod- 
ucts were amplified by using AccuPowerH PCR PreMix (BIONEER, Corp., Daejeon) in 
20 ul reaction mixtures containing 0.4 uM of each primer, 20 uM of the dNTPs, 20 uM 
of the MgCL,, and 0.05 ug of the genomic DNA template. PCR amplification was per- 
formed using a GS1 thermo-cycler (Gene Technologies, Ltd., U.K) according to the fol- 
lowing procedure: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C 
for 35 sec; an annealing temperature of 48 °C for 25 sec; an extension at 72 °C for 45 sec, 
and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were visualized by electro- 
phoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. A single band was observed, purified using a QlAquick 
PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Inc.), and then sequenced directly using an automated 
sequencer (ABI Prism 3730 XL DNA Analyzer) at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). 

Sequence alignment was performed in MEGA version 7 (Kumar et al. 2016) with 
ClustalW method. To estimate the pairwise genetic distances, the P-distance model 
was conducted using MEGA version 7. 


Results 


Total of 630 bp of the COI locus were sequenced for Cratospila albosignata sp. nov. 
(GenBank accession no. ON504323), Cratospila longivena sp. nov. (GenBank accession 
no. ON504322), C. albifera Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 (GenBank accession no. 
MW376064), C. luteocephala Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 (GenBank accession no. 


176 Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al. / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184 (2022) 


MW376065) and C. syntoma Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 (GenBank accession no. 
MW3760066). Pairwise genetic distances were caculated by using ‘P-distance’ model 
with option for pairwise deletion; C. albosignata differed by 7% from C. longivena, by 
7% from C. albifera, by 9% from C. luteocephala and by 6% from C. syntoma (Table 1). 


Taxonomy 


Cratospila Foerster, 1863 
Figs 1, 2 


Cratospila Foerster, 1863: 265; Shenefelt. 1974: 985; Wharton 1980: 84; Tobias 1990; 
Belokobylskij 1998: 287; Yao et al. 2016: 1; Zhu et al. 2017: 60. Type species (by 
monotypy): Alysia circe Haliday, 1838. 

Hedylus Marshall, 1891: 14-15 (not Foerster, 1868); Papp 2009: 29-30 (as synonym 
of Cratospila because of synonymising both type species). Type species (by mono- 
typy): Hedylus habilis Marshall, 1894 (examined; = Alysia circe Haliday, 1838). 


Diagnosis. First flagellomere 1.5—2.1 times longer than second (Figs 1B, 2B), most 
species with 8—13 white segments in apical part of antenna (unknown of C. longivena, 
but has reddish brown head, morphologically related to C. albifera and has accord- 
ing to the COI analysis a derived position compared to other species), face with setae 
(Figs 1E, 2E), eye slightly oval, clypeus protruding anteriorly (Figs 1E, 2E), clypeus 
large, triangularly shaped and ventrally truncate, mandible with three teeth, second 
tooth narrow and sharp, maxillary palp with six segments, as long as mesosoma; no- 
tauli at least present anteriorly, scutellar sulcus distinct, precoxal sulcus medially deep- 
ly impressed and coarsely crenulate, more or less reduced anteriorly and posteriorly 
(Figs 1G, 2G); fore wing (Figs 1C, 2C) vein 2-SR slightly bent, vein 3-SR shorter than 
vein 2-SR; veins 2-SR+M and r-m not sclerotized, hind wing vein 1-M shorter than 
vein 1r-m; first tergite longer than second (Figs 1H, 2H). 

Biology. Rather small genus, of which the biology is unknown. 

Distribution. Cosmopolitan, except Neotropical region. 


Key to species of Cratospila Foerster from Korea 


1 Mesoscutum medio-posteriorly and scutellum reddish brown; notauli on 
middle of mesoscutum comparatively coarsely crenulate; pterostigma rather 
slender and narrowly yellow basally; vein 1-SR+M of fore wing slightly sinu- 
ate; mesosoma 1.5—1.6 times longer than high in lateral view and anterior 
half of propodeum less sloping; propodeum less extensively rugose medially; 
antennal sockets comparatively close to level of inner side of eyes; [head in 
dorsal -viewruzellowésly brow | iecnew ves nee onertece vor oo sacey Sage ong onvcenttne vontncicemevtecusens 2 

= Mesoscutum medio-posteriorly and scutellum black; head in dorsal view 
more transverse and at least posteriorly darkened; notauli on middle of 


Review of the genus Cratospila (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from S. Korea 177 


mesoscutum narrowly crenulate; pterostigma rather robust and brown basal- 
ly; vein 1-SR+M of fore wing nearly straight; mesosoma 1.4—1.5 times longer 
than high in lateral view and anterior half of propodeum largely sloping; pro- 
podeum more extensively rugose medially; antennal sockets more removed 
FrOMIR CVE ROL MINS SIME VCSr. 9: acta rca daetctypuseseteneeeadee somave costs weiss ee + 
Minimum width of face 0.9 times its height (measured from lower rim of 
antennal socket to upper medio-dorsal margin of clypeus); vein r of fore wing 
approx. 3 times longer than wide; first subdiscal cell of fore wing approx. 7.5 
times longer than wide; [colour of apical antennal segments unknown]........ 
L en Ateee mau cael eet See ce C. luteocephala Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 
Minimum width of face 1.2 times its height; vein r of fore wing 4—5 times 
longer than wide; first subdiscal cell of fore wing 4—5 times longer than wide; 
[antenna ot 9 with*lO—1l white segments] oie, Se ee ee ee 3 
First tergite about twice as long as wide apically; eye in dorsal view approx. 
2.4 times longer than temple and head in dorsal view more transverse (Fig. 
2 in Papp 2009); apical antennal segment dark brown; vein r of fore wing 
leSS<OD HG tie ati. OAGs 4 3. eat a5. tuaise aa eslnttash Peak t cant Santon’ Rash amen eau Sun theo? 
RNS tes RA IGe, hot TURE Peter ean. C. ponerola (Papp, 2009) comb. nov. 
First tergite approx. 2.8 times longer than its apical width; eye in dorsal view 
approx. 1.9 times longer than temple and head in dorsal view less transverse 
(Fig. 1D in Sohn et al. 2021); apical antennal segment white; vein r of fore wing 
more oblique (Fig. 1C lic.) ve. C. albifera Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 
Vein 2-SR 1.8-1.9 times longer than vein 3-SR; first subdiscal cell approx. 8 
times longer than wide; minimum width of face 0.95 times its height; [pedi- 
cellus entirely yellow; head (except posteriorly) yellowish brown; antenna of 
2 with 10-11 white or ivory segments and apical segment dark brown, pale 
part 4.6 times longer than apical dark brown part] ...... cece eeeeeeseeseeereeeeeees 
ster eavgsticeabens Mite RsSyuovenl ue vsee Oona tins C. ejuncida Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 
Vein 2-SR 1.4—1.5 times longer than vein 3-SR; first subdiscal cell 5—6 times 
longer than wide; minimum width of face 1.1—1.3 times its height............. 5 
Eye in dorsal view approx. 1.6 times longer than temple; vein r of fore wing 
about as long as wide; head black dorsally; pedicellus partly infuscated; [mini- 
miiin avid thot ace T eis dts HeIO Nel is... cact Siaseenastond. scrcteadlt ec Masdasebnate Rea’ 
Fe ee emeiniece ete curtateeraeate C. syntoma Sohn & van Achterberg, 2021 
Eye in dorsal view 2.3—2.8 times longer than temple; vein r of fore wing about 
twice as long as wide; head reddish brown or blackish brown dorsally; pedi- 
GEMS VOU Woe cec Mave t caenehirh se iets sears c tackesitalagt Maree cai Jouelohas ei caaue rier neauad eles 6 
First tergite comparatively slender (Fig. 2F), approx. 3.5 times longer than 
its apical width; minimum width of face 1.1 times its height; head blackish 
BOW Corsa Vas ssn cmssttaaascnsarasasstaucaiuiestealencadesotedatate C. longivena sp. nov. 
First tergite comparatively robust (Fig. 1F), approx. 2.9 times longer than 
its apical width; minimum width of face 1.3 times its height; head reddish 
BrOyul GOrsalliyAls. Juin ssn ityaaeiontarete ueties Wababsn ssi Mee C. albosignata sp. nov. 


178 Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al. / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184 (2022) 


Cratospila albosignata Sohn & van Achterberg, sp. nov. 
https://zoobank.org/DF862519-BCFF-4322-BA83-591378EF63B 1 
Fig. 1A-I 


Type material. Holotype, 2° (NIBR), SourH Korea, Nebang-ri, Sudong-myeon, 
Nanyangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, 37°45'24.2"N, 127°16'38"E, 14.1V.2020, Sohn. Gen- 
Bank accession no. ON504323. 

Description. Holotype, 2, length of body 2.8 mm in lateral, length of antenna 
4.5 mm and of fore wing 2.7 mm. 

Colour: Body (Fig. 1A) black, but head (Fig. 1A), first tergite and mesonotum 
entirely reddish brown; antenna yellowish brown basally, medially dark brown, subapi- 
cally white (11 flagellomeres); mandible pale orange. 

Head (Fig. 1D): Width of head 1.6 times its median length in dorsal view. Antenna 
1.6 times longer than body, 32 segmented. First flagellomere 2.1 times longer than sec- 
ond and 8.7 times longer than wide. Compounded eye slightly oval, in lateral view 1.2 
times as long as wide. Minimum width of face (Fig. 1E) 1.3 times its height (measured 
from ventral rim of antennal sockets to upper margin of clypeus). Eye in dorsal view 2.3 
times as long as temple. Ocello-ocular line (OOL) 3.5 times longer than diameter of 
anterior ocellus; OOL: antero-posterior ocellar line (AOL) : postero-ocellar line (POL) 
= 30:8: 13. Stemmaticum concave. Vertex smooth and with polished stripe. Mandible 
pale yellow with three teeth, first tooth lobe-shape, second tooth narrow and sharp with 
reddish brown tip. Maxillary palp white and approx. as long as mesosoma. 

Mesosoma: Mesosoma 1.8 times longer than wide in dorsal view; 0.7 times longer 
than wide in lateral view. Mesoscutum (Fig. 1G) with medio-posterior depression; no- 
tauli distinctly impressed anteriorly, not reaching medio-posterior depression; scutellar 
sulcus with six carinae; in lateral view, ventral of mesopleuron and metapleuron with 
setae. metanotum sculptured. Propodeum (Fig. 1H) 0.5 times longer than wide, ante- 
rior half of propodeum smooth, posterior of median carina wrinkled; precoxal sulcus 
(Fig. 1F) deep and distinct, with more than 14 carinae, propodeum not curved dorsally 
in lateral view. Fore wing (Fig. 1C) 2.4 times as long as wide in maximum length; pter- 
ostigma 3.9 times longer than wide; vein r of fore wing 3 times longer than wide; vein 
2-SR slightly bent; vein 2-SR+M and r-m not sclerotized; 2-SR: r : 3-SR = 17: 3: 12; 
first discal cell of fore wing approx. 1.3 times longer than wide; first subdiscal cell of 
fore wing approx. 5 times longer than wide. Hind wing vein M+CU:: vein 1-M=11:1 

Leg: Hind coxa compressed and grooved; hind coxa 1.4 times longer than hind 
trochanter; hind femur 4.2 times longer than wide and 0.7 times longer than hind 
tibia; hind tibia as long as hind tarsus. 

Metasoma: First tergite striate and narrow, 2.9 times longer than its apical width 
and dark brown, [1:12 = 52:39. Setose part of ovipositor sheath (Fig. 11) 0.4 times as 
long as mesosoma, 0.5 times as long as hind tibia and with long setae. 

Male. Unknown. 

Distribution. South Korea. 

Etymology. Named after the conspicuous white apex of the 2 antenna: “albo” is derived 
from “albus” (Latin for white) and “signata” is derived from “signatus” (Latin for marked). 


Review of the genus Cratospila (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from S. Korea 179 


Figure |. Cratospila albosignata sp. nov. A habitus, lateral view B antennae C wings D head, dorsal 


view E head, front view F mesosoma, dorsal view G mesosoma, lateral view H anterior half of metasoma, 
dorsal view I ovipositor sheath, lateral view. 


Cratospila longivena Sohn & van Achterberg, sp. nov. 
https://zoobank.org/13631339-38B5-4DF1-9C13-A3E03E5E78E2 
Fig. 2A—I 


Type material. Holotype, 9 (NIBR), SourH Korea, Unilam Banilam, Jucheon-my- 
eon, Jinan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, 35°58'49"N, 127°23'49.2"E, 17—24.VII.2019, Sohn. 
GenBank accession no. ON504322. 

Comparative diagnosis. Differ from other South Korean species of Cratospila by 
having the first tergite very long (3.5 times longer than its apical width; 2.5—2.9 times 


180 Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al. / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184 (2022) 


in other species). Unfortunately, some apical segments of antenna are missing, but 
COI analysis apparently showed that it is genetically close to C. syntoma. 

Description. Holotype, 2, length of body in lateral view 2.9 mm, and of fore 
wing 2.8 mm. 

Colour: Body (Fig. 2A) black, head dorsally blackish brown, remainder of head, 
first tergite and mesonotum entirely reddish brown; antenna yellowish brown basally, 
medially dark brown (apical part of antenna missing, but according to notes made in 
Netherlands with at least 7 white segments). 

Head (Fig. 2D): Width of head 1.5 times its median length in dorsal view. First flag- 
ellomere 1.6 times longer than second and 7.3 times longer than wide; most of antenna 
lost during transport from Netherlands to Korea. Compounded eye slightly oval and 
glossy, in lateral view 1.2 times as long as wide. Width of face (Fig. 2E) 1.1 times its height 
(measured from ventral rim of antennal sockets to upper margin of clypeus). Face with 
long setae and glabrous. Eye in dorsal view 2.8 times as long as temple. Ocello-ocular line 
(OOL) 3.6 times longer than diameter of anterior ocellus; OOL: antero-posterior ocellar 
line (AOL) : postero-ocellar line (POL) = 32 : 8 : 13. Stemmaticum concave and with 
setae. Mandible entirely pale orange, with three teeth, second tooth narrow and sharp 
with dark brown tip, and separated from first tooth and third tooth. Third tooth with 
carina in ventral view. Medial length of mandible 1.6 times its maximum width. Labrum 
0.7 times longer than maximum width. Maxillary palp 0.8 times longer than mesosoma. 

Mesosoma: Mesosoma 2.0 times longer than its maximum width in dorsal view 
and 1.4 times its height in lateral view. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G) with medio-posterior 
depression; notauli chain-shaped, nearly complete but not reaching medio-posteri- 
or depression; scutellar sulcus with six distinct carinae; in lateral view mesopleuron 
smooth and glossy, apical parts with setae; metapleuron smooth with setae; metano- 
tum sculptured; small basal bump on hind coxa. Propodeum (Fig. 2H) 0.6 times 
longer than wide, anterior half of propodeum smooth, posterior of median carina 
strongly wrinkled; precoxal sulcus (Fig. 2F) deep and distinct, with about eight cari- 
nae, propodeum curved in lateral view. Fore wing (Fig. 2C) 2.4 times as long as wide; 
pterostigma long and narrow, 3.2 times longer than wide; vein r of fore wing 3.5 times 
longer than wide; vein 2-SR slightly bent; vein 2-SR+M and r-m not sclerotized; 2-SR: 
r:3-SR= 11:2: 7; first subdiscal cell of fore wing approx. 5 times longer than wide. 
Hind wing M+CU: 1-M = 22: 4. 


Table |. COI pairwise genetic distances between the three Cvatospila spp. from South Korea. 


C. albosignata _C. longivena C. albifera —_C. luteocephala C. syntoma 
C. albosignata 0.000 


C. longivena 0.075 0.000 
C. albifera 0.073 0.092 0.000 
C. luteocephala 0.094 0.092 0.098 0.000 


C. syntoma 0.059 0.071 0.073 0.089 0.000 


Review of the genus Cratospila (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from S. Korea 181 


Figure 2. (A-I) Cratospila longivena sp. nov.2. A habitus, lateral view B antennae C wings D head, 


dorsal view E head, front view F mesosoma, dorsal view G mesosoma, lateral view H anterior half of 


metasoma, dorsal view I ovipositor sheath, lateral view. 


Leg: Hind coxa compressed and grooved; hind coxa 1.2 times longer than hind 
trochanter; hind femur 5.5 times longer than wide and 0.7 times longer than hind 
tibia; hind tibia as long as hind tarsus. 

Metasoma: First tergite striate and narrow, 3.5 times longer than apical width, 
T1:T2= 5:3. Setose part of ovipositor sheath (Fig. 21) 0.5 times as long as mesosoma, 
0.5 times as long as hind tibia and with long setae. 


Male. Unknown. 


182 Ju-Hyeong Sohn et al. / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 92: 173-184 (2022) 


Distribution. South Korea. 
Etymology. Named after the comparatively long vein r of the fore wing: “/ongi” is 
derived from “longus” (Latin for long) and “vena” is Latin for vein. 


Acknowledgements 


This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources 
(NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea 
(NIBR202203201). And this work was also supported by a grant from the National 
Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment 
(MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202231206). This research was also supported 
by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of 
Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A3B07044298). 


References 


Belokobylskij SA (1998) Tribe Alysiini. In: Ler PA (Ed.) Key to the Insects of Russian Far East. 
Dal nauka, Vladivostok, 163-298. [In Russian] 

Chabert S, Allemand R, Poyet M, Eslin PB, Gibert P (2012) Ability of European parasitoids 
(Hymenoptera) to control a new invasive Asiatic pest, Drosophila suzukii. Biological 
Control 63: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.05.005 

Docavo I, Tormos J, Fischer M (2002) Three new species of Chorebus from Spain (Hyme- 
noptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae). Florida Entomologist 85(1): 208-215. https://doi. 
org/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0208: TNSOCEF]2.0.CO;2 

Favret C (2005) New non-destructive DNA extraction and specimen clearing technique 
for aphids (Hemiptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 107: 
469-470. 

Foerster A (1863) Synopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Braconiden. Verhandlungen des 
Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens 19: 225-288. 

Haliday AH (1835) Essay on parasitic Hymenoptera. Entomological Magazine 2: 458-468. 

Haliday AH (1838) Essay on parasitic Hymenoptera. Entomological Magazine 5(3): 209-249. 

Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis ver- 
sion 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870-1874. https://doi. 
org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 

Marshall TA (1891) A monograph of the British Braconidae Part IV. Transactions of the Royal 
Entomological Society of London 1891: 7-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1891. 
tb01642.x 

Marshall TA (1894) A monograph of the British Braconidae Part V. Transactions 
of the Royal Entomological Society of London 1894: 497-534. https://doi. 
org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1894.tb02098.x 


Review of the genus Cratospila (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from S. Korea 183 


NIBR (2012) Korean type specimens of insects deposited in Hungarian Natural History Mu- 
seum. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 424 pp. 

NIBR (2021) National List of Species of Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources, 
Incheon, 988 pp. [11-1480592-001514-01] http://kbr.go.kr [accessed on 16.iii.2022] 
Ozawa A, Saito T, Ota M (2001) Biological control of the American Serpentine leafminer, 

Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess), on tomato in greenhouses by parasitoids. H. Evaluation of 
biological control by Diglyphus isaea (Walker) and Dacnusa sibirica Telenga in commer- 
cial greenhouses. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 45(2): 61-74. 

https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.2001.61 

Papp J (2009) Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from Korea XXIII. Subfamilies Agathidinae and 
Alysiinae. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 55(3): 235-261. 

Shenefelt RD (1974) Braconidae 7. Alysiinae. Hymenopterorum Catalogus. Pars 11: 985-1113. 

Sohn JH, van Achterberg C, Han YJ, Kim H (2021) Four new species of the genus Cratospila 
Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) from South Korea. Zookeys 1022: 51-64. 
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1022.62562 

Tobias VI (1990) Three new species alysiin-wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae) from 
Vietnam. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta 209: 99-106. [In Russian] 

van Achterberg C (1993) Illustrated key to the subfamilies of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera: 
Ichneumonoidea). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 283: 1-189. 

Wharton RA (1980) Review of the Nearctic Alysiini (Hymenoptera, Braconidae): with discus- 
sion of generic relationships within the tribe. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA 
88: 1-112. 

Wharton RA, Marsh P, Sharkey M (1997) Manual of the New World Genera of the Family 
Braconidae (Hymenoptera). The International Society of Hymenopterists. Washington 
D.C., 439 pp. 

Wharton RA (2002) Revision of the Australian Alysiini (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). 
Invertebrate Systematics 16: 7-105. https://doi.org/10.1071/IT01012 

Wu Z-S, Chen J-H (1995) Discovery of Cratospila Foerster from China (Hymenoptera, 
Braconidae). Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 24: 310-311. 

Yaakop S, Aman AZ (2012) Updating the subfamily Alysiinae Blanchard (Hymenoptera: 
Braconidae) from Malaysia. Serangga 17(1): 37-46. 

Yao J-L, van Achterberg C, Chen J-H (2016) The genus Cvatospila Foerster (Hymenoptera: 
Braconidae: Alysiinae) in China, with two newly recorded species. Chinese Scientific 
Papers Online, 1-9. http://www.paper.edu.cn 

Yu DSK, van Achterberg C, Horstmann K (2016) Taxapad 2016, Ichneumonoidea 2015. 
Database on flash-drive. Nepean, Ontario. 

Zhu J-C, van Achterberg C, Chen X-X (2017) An illustrated key to the genera and subgenera 
of the Alysiini (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae), with three genera new for China. 


ZooKeys 722: 37—79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.722.14799